Investigating the Urban trees’ diversity in Tehran –Iran using i-Tree Eco model


  • Reihaneh Rasoolzadeh Environmental Sciences Research Institute of Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
  • Naghmeh Mobarghaee Dinan Environmental Sciences Research Institute of Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
  • Hassan Esmaeilzadeh Environmental Sciences Research Institute of Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
  • Yousef Rashidi Environmental Sciences Research Institute of Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran



i-tree Eco model, Trees diversity, Urban green spaces


Urban green spaces’ structure and function can promote human health and environmental quality and also decrease some challenges that have been increased due to urbanization. So, it is important to do some studies to investigate the urban trees’ diversity and structure because it can not only raise environmental awareness but also help policymakers for better management to achieve the desired environment. According to our knowledge, there has been done no investigation on the diversity of the urban trees of Tehran. The present study aims to assess the current structure and diversity of trees in Tehran green spaces (as a case study), using the i-Tree Eco model. Data from 316 field plots were collected during the growing season. It must be noted that the primary number of plots was 330, but some of them were not accessible. The plots were selected based on a randomized cluster sampling method and analyzed using the i-Tree Eco model. The results indicate that the overall tree density in Tehran is about 97 trees/ ha and the number of trees is about 7,127,933. The most common tree species are Afghan pine (13.0 percent), Black locust (10.0 percent) and, Arizona cypress (9.4 percent). In Tehran, about 28 percent of the trees are Asian endemic species and most trees have American origin (26 percent of the trees). Tehran urban trees are composed of endemic and exotic tree species. Therefore, Tehran's urban forest often has a diversity that is higher than the surrounding native landscape. Thus, the paper illustrates a methodology to assess the current structure and trees’ diversity of urban forests, which helps the development of future urban tree planting strategies and quantitative assessment.


Blood, A., Starr, G., Escobedo, F., Chappelka, A., & Staudhammer, C. (2016). How do urban forests compare? Tree diversity in urban and periurban forests of the southeastern US. Forests, 7(6), 120.

Chimaimba, F. B., Kafumbata, D., Chanyenga, T., & Chiotha, S. (2020). Urban tree species composition and diversity in Zomba city, Malawi: Does land-use type matter?. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 54, 126781.

Chinchilla, J., Carbonnel, A., & Galleguillos, M. (2021). Effect of urban tree diversity and condition on the surface temperature at the city block scale. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 60, 127069.

Dangulla, M., Abd Manaf, L., Ramli, M. F., & Yacob, M. R. (2020). Urban tree composition, diversity, and structural characteristics in North-western Nigeria. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 48, 126512.

Fan, C., Johnston, M., Darling, L., Scott, L., & Liao, F. H. (2019). Land use and socio-economic determinants of urban forest structure and diversity. Landscape and urban planning, 181, 10-21.

Grêt-Regamey, A., Altwegg, J., Sirén, E. A., Van Strien, M. J., & Weibel, B. (2017). Integrating ecosystem services into spatial planning- A spatial decision support tool. Landscape and Urban Planning, 165, 206-219.

Intasen, M., Hauer, R.J., Werner, L.P., Larsen, E., 2017. Urban forest assessment in Bangkok, Thailand. J. Sustain. For. 36, 148–163.

i-Tree Eco User’s manual (2021). i-Tree eco user’s manual. i-Tree Tools. Retrieved from

Jiao, M., Xue, H., Yan, J., Zheng, Z., Wang, J., Zhao, C., Zhang, L & Zhou, W. (2021). Tree abundance, diversity, and their driving and indicative factors in Beijing’s residential areas. Ecological Indicators, 125, 107462.

Kendal, D., Dobbs, C., & Lohr, V. I. (2014). Global patterns of diversity in the urban forest: Is there evidence to support the 10/20/30 rule?. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(3), 411-417.

Kiss, M., Takacs, A., Pogacsas, R., & Gulyas, A. (2015). The role of ecosystem services in climate and air quality in urban areas: Evaluating carbon sequestration and air pol­lution removal by street and park trees in Szeged (Hungary). Moravian Geographical Reports, 23(3), 36-46. https:/ /

Li, X., Jia, B., Zhang, W., Ma, J., & Liu, X. (2020). Woody plant diversity spatial patterns and the effects of urbanization in Beijing, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 56, 126873.

Ma, B., Hauer, R. J., Wei, H., Koeser, A. K., Peterson, W., Simons, K., Nilsen, T., Werner, P.L & Xu, C. (2020). An Assessment of Street Tree Diversity: Findings and Implications in the United States. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 56, 126826.

Mikulanis, V.( 2014). Phoenix, Arizona Project Area, Community Forest Assessment.

Morgenroth, J., Östberg, J., van den Bosch, C. K., Nielsen, A. B., Hauer, R., Sjöman, H., Chen, W & Jansson, M. (2016). Urban tree diversity—Taking stock and looking ahead. Urban forestry & urban greening, 15, 1-5.

Nowak, D. (2013). A guide to assessing urban forests. Retrieved from nrs/pubs/inf/nrs_inf_24_13.pdf.

Nowak, D. J. (2017). Assessing the benefits and economic values of trees. In: Ferrini, Francesco; van den Bosch, Cecil CK; Fini, Alessio, eds. Routledge handbook of urban forestry. New York, NY: Routledge: 152-163. Chapter 11., 152-163.

Nowak, D. J. (2019). Understanding i-Tree: Summary of programs and methods. USDA Forest

Nowak, D. J., Hoehn, R. E., Bodine, A. R., Greenfield, E. J., & O’Neil-Dunne, J. (2016). Urban forest structure, ecosystem services and change in Syracuse, NY. Urban Ecosystems, 19(4), 1455-1477.

Nowak, D.J., Cumming, A., Twardus, D. ( 2011). Urban forests of Tennessee, Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–149. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station.

Nyelele, C., & Kroll, C. N. (2020). The equity of urban forest ecosystem services and benefits in the Bronx, NY. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 53, 126723.

Pace, M., Sales, T., 2012. Mesquite Urban Forest Ecosystem Analysis.

Paquette, A., Sousa-Silva, R., Maure, F., Cameron, E., Belluau, M., & Messier, C. (2021). Praise for diversity: A functional approach to reduce risks in urban forests. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 62, 127157.

PARD, P.( 2014). Plano Urban Forest Ecosystem Analysis.

Parsa, V. A., Salehi, E., Yavari, A. R., & van Bodegom, P. M. (2019). Analyzing temporal changes in urban forest structure and the effect on air quality improvement. Sustainable Cities and Society, 48, 101548.

Pyles, M. V., Magnago, L. F., Borges, E. R., van den Berg, E., & Carvalho, F. A. (2020). Land use history drives differences in functional composition and losses in functional diversity and stability of Neotropical urban forests. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 49, 126608.

Riley, C. B., Herms, D. A., & Gardiner, M. M. (2017). Exotic trees contribute to urban forest diversity and ecosystem services in inner-city Cleveland, OH. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29.

Riley, C. B., Herms, D. A., & Gardiner, M. M. (2018). Exotic trees contribute to urban forest diversity and ecosystem services in inner-city Cleveland, OH. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29, 367-376.

Roy, S., Byrne, J., & Pickering, C. (2012). A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban forestry & urban greening, 11(4), 351-363.

Statistical Center of Iran (2016). Population and housing census 2016.RetrievedMarch 28, 2018, from

Tehran statistical yearbook, 2018, Information and Communication Technology Organization of Tehran Municipality. Retrieved from

Wang, B., Tian, C., & Liang, Y. (2021). Mixed-effects of landscape structure, tree diversity and stand’s relative position on insect and pathogen damage in riparian poplar forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 479, 118555.

Wang, H. F., Qureshi, S., Qureshi, B. A., Qiu, J. X., Friedman, C. R., Breuste, J., & Wang, X. K. (2016). A multivariate analysis integrating ecological, socioeconomic and physical characteristics to investigate urban forest cover and plant diversity in Beijing, China. Ecological Indicators, 60, 921-929.

Wood, S. L. R., & Dupras, J. (2021). Increasing functional diversity of the urban canopy for climate resilience: Potential tradeoffs with ecosystem services?. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 58, 126972.

Yan, P., & Yang, J. (2017). Species diversity of urban forests in China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 28, 160-166.

Zięba-Kulawik, K., Hawryło, P., Wężyk, P., Matczak, P., Przewoźna, P., Inglot, A., & Mączka, K. (2021). Improving methods to calculate the loss of ecosystem services provided by urban trees using LiDAR and aerial orthophotos. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 127195.




How to Cite

Rasoolzadeh, R. ., Mobarghaee Dinan, N. ., Esmaeilzadeh, H. ., & Rashidi, Y. . (2022). Investigating the Urban trees’ diversity in Tehran –Iran using i-Tree Eco model. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity, 6(2), 61–73.