Mapping the distribution of the European Red Wood Ant in Turkey and its key factors in conservation planning


  • Cansu Dumlu Republic of Turkey Minister of Agriculture and Forestry, General Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks, Department of Kirklareli, Kirklareli, Turkey
  • Yılmaz Camlitepe Trakya University, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, Balkan Campus, Edirne, Turkey



Conservation biology, Conservation zones, Formica pratensis, red wood ants, Geographic Information Systems


In this study, 82 nests in the Thrace region, the only distribution area of the European redwood ant (Formica pratensis Retzius,1783) in Turkey, were identified and monitored for two years. A nest ID was created for each nest, showing nest features, strategic location, habitat characteristics and some morphometric differences of workers. The species ' living areas (area of occupancy, AOO) and extension of occurrence (EOO) calculations were also carried out. Statistical analyses were carried out to show the relationships between these features. The results demonstrated that the optimum distribution of the nests is between 300-600 m, and the nests are mainly located at a distance of 0-200 m close to the water source. Nests are mostly built facing south in open areas in fields or forests, and the B-shaped nest is the most frequently observed nest morphology. Moreover, colony individuals frequently visit oak and blackberry species, and the Thracian population tends to form monodomous nests at a rate of 95%. The relationship between the morphological characteristics of ants (NHLI, NBH, LBH and HW), nest altitude data, and the distance of nests to water sources and forest areas was tested with Spearman rank correlation analysis, and a weak reverse correlation was found between the averages of NBH data and nest altitudes (r: -0.300; p<0.05), at 95% confidence interval. Accordingly, the AOO of the species in the Thrace region was calculated as 50,176 m2 and the EOO was 3,682 km2. All nests are shown on political maps, and applicable maps have been created in which buffer zoning and conservation areas are suggested. In total, 36 conservation and awareness training types were also carried out in two years, reaching 1201 students, and 92% awareness was created. Our results indicate that the nests cannot remain stable for many years due to intense human pressure.


Aksoy V., & Camlitepe Y. (2018). Effects of genetic relatedness, spatial distance and context on intraspecific aggression in the red wood ant Formica pratensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Turkish Journal of Zoology, Volume 42, Issue 3, 297 – 306.

Antonova, V., & Marinov, M. P. (2021). Red wood ants in Bulgaria: distribution and density related to habitat characteristics. Journal of Hymenoptera Research, C 85, S 135.

Berberich, G. M., & Berberich. M.B. (2023). "A Re-Inventory after 12 Years—Increase in Red Wood Ant Nests and Woodpecker Cavities in Nests in the West Eifel Volcanic Field despite Climatic Changes" Forests 14, no. 5: 985.

Beye M, Neumann P., Chapuisat M., Pamilo P., Moritz R. (1998). Nestmate recognition and the genetic relatedness of nests in the ant Formica pratensis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 43(1), 67-72.

Bonte D, Dekoninck W, Provoost S, Cosijns E, Hoffmann M. (2003). Microgeographical distribution of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in coastal dune grassland and their relation to the soil structure and vegetation. Animal Biology, 53(4), 367-377.

Camlitepe Y., & Aksoy V. (2019). Distribution and Conservation Status of the European Red Wood Ant Species Formica pratensis Retzius, 1783 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in (European) Turkey. Journal of the Entomological Research Society, 21(2), 199-211.

Camlitepe Y., Aksoy V., Lapeva-Gjonova A., Yence K., Dumlu C., Gjonov I. (2021). Preliminary Research on Some Morphometric Characteristics of European Red Wood Ants along the Turkey-Bulgaria Cross-Border Area. Kırklareli University Journal of Engineering and Science 7-2, 187-195pp.

Chen YH., & Robinson EJ. (2014). The Relationship Between Canopy Cover and Colony Size of the Wood Ant Formica lugubris-Implications For The Thermal Effects On A Keystone Ant Species. PLoS One, 9(12), e116113

Czechowski W., & Vepsäläinen K. (2009). Territory size of wood ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a search for limits of existence of Formica polyctena Först., an inherently polygynic and polycalic species. Paper presented at the Annales Zoologici.

Dekoninck W, Hendrickx F, Grootaert P, Maelfait JP. (2010). Present Conservation Status Of Red Wood Ants In North-Western Belgium: Worse Than Previously, But Not A Lost Cause. European Journal of Entomology, 107(2).

Dickinson JL., & Bonney R. (2012). Citizen Science: Public Participation In Environmental Research. Ithaca And London, Comstock Pub. Associates.

Domisch T, Ohashi M, Finér L, Risch A, Sundström L, Kilpeläinen J, Niemelä P. (2008). Decomposition Of Organic Matter And Nutrient Mineralisation In Wood Ant (Formica rufa Group) Mounds In Boreal Coniferous Forests Of Different Age. Biology and Fertility of soils, 44(3), 539-545.

Eeva T, Sorvari J, Koivunen V. (2004). Effects Of Heavy Metal Pollution On Red Wood Ant (Formica s. str.) Populations. Environmental pollution, 132(3), 533-539.

Frouz J, Jilkova V, Sorvari J. (2016). Contribution of Wood Ants to Nutrient Cycling and Ecosystem Function. Wood ant ecology and conservation, 207.

Freitag A, Stockan J, Bernasconi C, Maeder A,Cherix D. (2016). Wood Ant Ecology And Conservation. Cambridge University Press,

Gemik Ö (2020). Annual Monitoring Program and Determination of Habitat Destruction of the European Red Wood Ant Formica pratensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Yıldız (Strandja) mountains. Trakya University Institute of Natural Sciences.

Gemik, Ö & Camlitepe Y. (2023) Annual Monitoring Programme Of European Red Wood Ants Distrubuted In Yildiz (Stranjha) Mountains. IJIAAR, Vol. 7 (3), 347-355.

IUCN (2023). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.-1. [Downloaded on 03 October 2023].

Groom MJ, Meffe GK., &Carroll CR. (2006). Principles of conservation biology: Sinauer Associates Sunderland.

Seifert B. (1992). Formica nigricans EMERY, 1909–an ecomorph of Formica pratensis RETZIUS, 1783 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Entomologica Fennica, 2, 217-226.

Stuart RJ., & Herbers JM. (2000). Nest mate recognition in ants with complex colonies: within-and between-population variation. Behavioral Ecology, 11(6), 676-685.

Subaşı Ü. (2014). Campanula tomentosa Lam. ve C.Vardariana Bocquet Convervation Biology and Genetic Diversity. (PhD Thesis), Ege University, İzmir.

Obin MS., & Vander Meer RK. (1988). Sources of nestmate recognition cues in the imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Animal Behaviour, 36(5), 1361-1370.

Van Groenestijn J, Hazewinkel J, Nienoord M, Bussmann P. (2002). Energy aspects of biological hydrogen production in high rate bioreactors operated in the thermophilic temperature range. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 27(11-12), 1141-1147.




How to Cite

Dumlu, C. ., & Camlitepe, Y. . (2023). Mapping the distribution of the European Red Wood Ant in Turkey and its key factors in conservation planning. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity, 7(supplementary issue), 152–172.